Thursday, February 17, 2005

jeff gannon fallout

does anyone else find this to be mind-blowing in today's world?  in the US?!

By my count, "Jeff Gannon" is now at least the sixth "journalist" (four of whom have been unmasked so far this year) to have been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast forums that purport to be real news. Of these six, two have been syndicated newspaper columnists paid by the Department of Health and Human Services to promote the administration's "marriage" initiatives. The other four have played real newsmen on TV. Before Mr. Guckert and Armstrong Williams, the talking head paid $240,000 by the Department of Education, there were Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia. Let us not forget these pioneers - the Woodward and Bernstein of fake news. They starred in bogus reports ("In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting," went the script) pretending to "sort through the details" of the administration's Medicare prescription-drug plan in 2004. Such "reports," some of which found their way into news packages distributed to local stations by CNN, appeared in more than 50 news broadcasts around the country and have now been deemed illegal "covert propaganda" by the Government Accountability Office.

COVERT PROPAGANDA.

A Pentagon Office of Strategic Influence, intended to provide propagandistic news items, some of them possibly false, to foreign news media was shut down in 2002 when it became an embarrassing political liability. But much more quietly, another Pentagon propaganda arm, the Pentagon Channel, has recently been added as a free channel for American viewers of the Dish Network. Can a Social Security Channel be far behind?

It is a brilliant strategy. When the Bush administration isn't using taxpayers' money to buy its own fake news, it does everything it can to shut out and pillory real reporters who might tell Americans what is happening in what is, at least in theory, their own government. Paul Farhi of The Washington Post discovered that even at an inaugural ball he was assigned "minders" - attractive women who wouldn't give him their full names - to let the revelers know that Big Brother was watching should they be tempted to say anything remotely off message.

1 comment:

  1. 1. 'A visitor' posted on the Mon 21 Feb 2005, 6:37 pm
    Oh, I believe it. It's like I have been saying (to your father, among others) for years: it's not that I know this administration is doing evil deeds. How could I, they've never let us have even the slightest idea what they are really doing. All I can know for sure is that they've made it pretty clear that they would rather obscure the facts than reveal them about pretty much everything; and why lie if you're not doing anything wrong?
    But by far, for me, the greatest mystery is this: how the heck did you link to and quote Frank Rich's NYTimes article of Feb. 20th in you blog entry for the 17th?? Do you have an internet time machine? And can I borrow it to place some sports bets?
    Baby Tyrone

    ReplyDelete